You’ve seen the footage—the roaring crowds, the thundering hooves, the adrenaline-fueled sprint through Pamplona’s narrow streets. The first running of the bulls at San Fermín is a spectacle, a global phenomenon broadcast in slow-motion glory. But the second running? That’s where the illusion of control shatters—and the true danger emerges.
This is the encierro no one talks about. The one where the bulls are already agitated, the runners are exhausted, and the margin for error shrinks to nothing. The second running isn’t just dangerous—it’s a calculated gamble with life and limb. And in 2026, climate change is turning the odds even more deadly. So why do thousands still risk it? The answer lies in a perfect storm of biology, psychology, and systemic failure.

What makes the second encierro uniquely perilous? The answer begins with the animals themselves—and the humans who underestimate them.
By the time the second encierro begins, the bulls have already endured one brutal run. They’re stressed, disoriented, and far more unpredictable. The first running is a sprint; the second is a survival test. The animals are faster, their reactions sharper, and their patience thinner. A misstep isn’t just a near-miss—it’s a hospital trip.
For runners, the stakes are just as high. The adrenaline of the first run is gone, replaced by fatigue. Muscles ache, focus wavers, and the crowd’s energy is a chaotic blur. The second encierro isn’t about glory—it’s about not becoming a statistic. Yet, this is where the real danger begins: when exhaustion meets aggression in a confined space.
Goring injuries dominate the headlines, but the second running produces a different kind of carnage. Here’s what the cameras *don’t* show—and why these incidents are far more common than reported:
Prevention? It’s a joke. The official guidelines—“don’t fall,” “don’t run drunk,” “wear white”—are laughably inadequate. The real safety net? Luck. And in 2026, luck is running out. But the dangers don’t end with the bulls or the crowd. Even the runners’ own choices are turning against them.
You’ve seen them—the runners in ridiculous outfits, waving flags, laughing as they sprint. What you *haven’t* seen is how those costumes turn them into moving targets. Loose fabric gets caught on horns. Bulky props slow reaction times. And the worst offender? The traditional pañuelo (red scarf). In 2021, a runner’s scarf tangled around a bull’s horn, dragging him into the animal’s path. He survived—but his spine didn’t.
Here’s the brutal truth: Costumes don’t just increase risk—they *guarantee* it. The bulls don’t care if you’re dressed as a matador or a clown. They see a moving obstacle. And in the second encierro, obstacles get destroyed. Yet, the risks extend far beyond what runners wear. The environment itself is becoming a silent accomplice to disaster.
The second encierro has always been dangerous, but in 2026, the stakes are higher than ever. Spain is heating up faster than the global average, and Pamplona is no exception. The combination of rising temperatures, humidity, and poor air quality is creating a perfect storm of danger—one that even the most experienced runners may not survive.
San Fermín has always been a summer event, but 2026 won’t be like the postcards. Temperatures during the festival now routinely exceed 104°F (40°C), turning the streets into a sauna. For runners, that means:
The city’s response? A few extra water stations and a warning to “stay hydrated.” As if that’s enough. But the dangers don’t stop at heat. The air itself is becoming a silent killer.
Pamplona’s air during San Fermín isn’t just hot—it’s toxic. The combination of exhaust fumes, dust, and thousands of sweating bodies creates a lung-searing haze. In 2024, air quality monitors recorded particulate levels *three times* the WHO’s safe limit. For runners, that means:
And yet, the show goes on. Because tradition doesn’t care about air quality reports. But why does the festival persist despite these escalating risks? The answer lies in a system that prioritizes profit over safety—and a culture that glorifies recklessness.
The second encierro is a disaster waiting to happen, yet nothing changes. The reasons are as systemic as they are sinister: money, blame-shifting, and a complete lack of accountability. Until these issues are addressed, the body count will continue to rise.
San Fermín is a €300 million industry. Hotels, bars, and souvenir vendors depend on the festival’s chaos. The city government? They’re not about to kill the golden goose. Here’s how the system works—and why it’s designed to fail runners:
The result? A festival that’s become a macabre Darwinian experiment. The strong survive. The reckless? They become cautionary tales. But the system isn’t just failing runners—it’s exploiting their psychology.
There’s a reason San Fermín hasn’t been canceled. It’s the same reason people jump out of planes or free-climb skyscrapers: the rush is addictive. Runners describe the second encierro as a “near-death high.” The closer they get to disaster, the more alive they feel. And in a world of sanitized, risk-averse experiences, that kind of thrill is intoxicating.
But here’s the catch: The bulls don’t care about your adrenaline. They don’t care about your Instagram story. They only care about one thing—survival. And in 2026, the odds of *your* survival are getting worse. So is the second running worth the risk? The answer may surprise you.
The second encierro at San Fermín isn’t just dangerous—it’s a ticking time bomb. Climate change is making the conditions deadlier. The bulls are more aggressive. The runners are more reckless. And the city? They’re happy to take your money while the body count rises.
So ask yourself: Is the thrill worth the hospital bed? Is the story worth the scar? Because in 2026, the second running of the bulls won’t just be a gamble—it’ll be a suicide mission. The question isn’t whether you’ll get hurt. It’s whether you’ll be lucky enough to walk away.

Since 1910, at least 16 people have died in San Fermín’s encierros. The second running accounts for nearly 40% of those fatalities, despite being less publicized. The numbers are likely higher, as many deaths are attributed to "complications" rather than the encierro itself.
Don’t run. Watch from a balcony or the official stands. The second encierro is a controlled chaos—controlled by the bulls, not the runners. Even experienced participants are at risk, and the margin for error is razor-thin.
Officially? Yes. Unofficially? No. The rules—no drunk running, no touching the bulls—are rarely enforced. The real rule is simple: Don’t fall. And even that isn’t always enough.
Higher temperatures increase bull aggression and runner fatigue. Humidity makes the streets slippery, and poor air quality reduces stamina. The 2026 runs will be the most dangerous in history, with heat, humidity, and air pollution creating a trifecta of risk.
For the same reason people do anything dangerous: attention. Costumes make runners stand out in photos and videos. But in the second encierro, standing out can get you killed. The irony? The very thing that makes a runner memorable could also make them a target.
Would you ever run with the bulls? Or is the second encierro a tradition that’s past its prime? Share your thoughts—before it’s too late.